Carrasco de Paula I. 1999. Liceità
dell’uso dei parametri della morte cerebrale per l’accertamento della
morte di una persona [Legitimation of the brain death criteria for
ascertaining a person’s death], Annales Theologici 13:
475–488.
Cobbe N. 2006. Why the apparent haste to
clone humans? Journal
of Medical Ethics 32:
298-302
Graf R. 2003. Klonen: Prüfstein für
die ethischen Prinzipien zum Schutz der Menschenwürde, St.
Ottilien, Germany: EOS Verlag.
Huarte J. 1991. L’individualité biologique
de l’embryon humain [the biological individuality of the human embryo],
Bioéthique 2: 248–251.
Suarez A. 1993. Sono l’embrione umano, il
bambino con anencefalia ed il paziente in stato vegetativo persistente
persone umane? Una dimostrazione razionale a partire dai movimenti
spontanei, [Are the human embryo, the anencephalic child, and the
patient in permanent vegetative state human persons? A rational proof
on the basis of the spontaneous movements] Acta Philosophica 2:
105–125.
Suarez A. 1993. La différentiation
cellulaire qui a lieu chez l’embryon après son implantation dans la
paroi utérine n’est pas commandée par des messages provenant de la
mère: Un théorème biologique [The Cellular Differentiation Which Takes
Place in the Embryo after Its Establishment in the Uterine Wall Is Not
Ordered by Messages Coming from the Mother: A Biological Theorem], Médecine
et Hygiène 51: 399–401.
Suarez A. 1990. Hydatidiform Moles and
Teratomas Confirm the Human Identity of the Preimplantation Embryo, Journal
of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 627–635.
Suarez A. 1990. Ist der menschliche Embryo
geistig beseelt? [Has the Human Embryo a Spiritual Soul?], Annales
Theologici 4: 69–107.
Suarez A. 1990. Darf man dem Embryo den
verfassungsrechtlichen Schutz der Menschenwürde absprechen? [Does the
human embryo enjoy the protection human dignity deserves in the
constitutional law?] Schweizerische Juristen Zeitung 86:
205–211.
Austriaco N.P.G. 2002. On Static Eggs and
Dynamic Embryos: A Systems Perspective, National Catholic
Bioethics Quarterly, Winter: 659–683.
Carnegie Stages Comparison Graph
(Species/Days), Accessed July 9, 2005 at: http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/OtherEmb/Mouse.htm.
Chawengsaksophak K. et al., “Cdx2 is
essential for axial elongation in mouse development”, Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 101.20 (May 18, 2004):
7641-7645.
Chen Z.F. and R.R. Behringer. 1995. Twist
is required in head mesenchyme for cranial neural tube morphogenesis, Genes
& Development, 9: 686-99.
Coghlan A. 2004. New Scientist,
184: 17
De Vries J.I.P., G.H.A. Visser and H.F.R.
Prechtl. 1982. The Emergence of Fetal Behaviour: I. Qualitative
Aspects, Early Human Development 7: 301–322.
Fraidenraich D. et al. 2004. Rescue of
Cardiac Defects in Id Knockout Embryos by Injection of Embryonic Stem
Cells, Science, 306: 247-252.
Gardner R.L. et al. 1990. Use of triple
tissue blastocyst reconstitution to study the development of diploid
parthenogenetic primitive ectoderm in combination with
fertilization-derived trophectoderm and primitive endoderm, Genetical
Research 56: 209-222.
Grompe M. and R. George. 2005. Creative
Science Will Resolve Stem-Cell Issues, Wall Street Journal,
June 20: A14.
Hurlbut W. B. 2004. Altered nuclear
transfer as a morally acceptable means for the procurement of human
embryonic stem cells. The President’s Council of Bioethics,
Background materials for the Meeting December 2-3, 2004 (Accessed March
6, 2005 at www.bioethics.gov/background/hurlbut.html).
Hurlbut W. B. 2005a. Altered nuclear
transfer as a morally acceptable means for the procurement of human
embryonic stem cells. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine,
48: 211–28.
Hurlbut W. B. 2005b. Correspondence:
Altered Nuclear Transfer, The New England Journal of Medicine,
352: 1153.
Hurlbut W. B. 2005c. Reply, The
National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, Spring: 21.
Joint Statement. 2005. Production of
Pluripotent Stem Cells by Oocyte Assisted Reprogramming. CBHD
Posted June 20 (Accessed July 28, 2005 at:
www.cbhd.org/resources/stemcells/jointstatment_2005-06-20.htm).
Kiessling A.A. 2005. Eggs alone”, Nature
434: 145.
Kono T. et al. 1996. Epigenetic
Modifications During Oocyte Growth Correlates with Extended
Parthenogenetic Development in the Mouse, Nature Genetics 13:
91–94.
Kono T. et al. 2002. Mouse Parthenogenetic
Embryos with Monoallelic H19 Expression can Develop to Day 17.5 of
Gestation, Developmental Biology 243: 294–300.
Kono T. et al. 2004. Birth of
Parthenogenetic Mice that Can Develop to Adulthood, Nature 428:
860–864.
Loebel D.A.F. and P.P.L. Tam. 2004.
Genomic imprinting. Mice without a father, Nature, 428:
809-811.
Melton D.A., G. Daley, and C.G. Jennings.
2005. Correspondence: Altered Nuclear Transfer. The New England
Journal of Medicine, 352: 1154
Melton D.A., G. Daley, and C.G. Jennings.
2004. Altered Nuclear Transfer in Stem-Cell Research — A Flawed
Proposal, The New England Journal of Medicine, 351:
2791-2792.
Melton D.A., G. Daley, and C.G. Jennings.
2005. Correspondence: Altered Nuclear Transfer. The New England
Journal of Medicine, 352: 1154.
Mitsui, K. Y. et al. 2003. The
homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse
epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113: 631-42.
President’s Council of Bioethics. May 2005.
Alternative sources of human pluripotent stem cells. A White Paper,
Washington D.C. (Accessed July 31, 2005 at: www.bioethics.gov)
Rogers N. T. et al. 2004. Phospholipase Cz
causes Ca 2+ oscillations and parthenogenetic activation of human
oocytes, Reproduction 128: 697–702
Rossant J. and A. Spence. 1998. Chimeras
and mosaics in mouse mutant analysis, Trends Genet. 14:
358-363
Sánchez-Pernaute R. et al. 2005. Long-term
survival of dopamine neurons derived from parthenogenetic primate
embryonic stem cells (Cyno1) after transplantation, Stem Cells
Express, doi:10.1634/stemcells.2004-0172.
Strain L. et al. 1995. A human
parthenogenetic chimaera, Nature Genetics 11:164–169.
Surani M.A.H. 2002. Immaculate
Misconception, Nature 416: 491–493.
Videos showing spontaneous fetal motility
: www.mamma.ch/de/hintergrund_embryo.htm
www.createhealth.org/dimensional.html
Vogel G. 2005. Embryo-free techniques gain
momentum, Science 309: 240-241.